Manejo en atención primaria de las infecciones de transmisión sexual (I). Epidemiología. Síndrome secretor / Primary care management of sexually transmitted infections (I). Epidemiology. Secreting syndrome

Actualmente las infecciones de transmisión sexual (ITS) son un problema de salud pública importante debido a su elevada prevalencia y a que precisan de un diagnóstico y un tratamiento precoces para evitar complicaciones. En los últimos años se está observando un aumento exponencial de los casos de infecciones causadas por Chlamydia trachomatis y gonococo en población menor de 25años. También se ha detectado un aumento de la incidencia de sífilis y de hepatitisC (VHC), sobre todo en hombres que tienen sexo con hombres (HSH). El herpes genital sigue siendo la segunda ITS más frecuente en el mundo, por detrás del condiloma acuminado, y la primera causa de úlcera genital en España en la población sexualmente activa. Durante el año 2020 se observó un descenso de los casos notificados de VIH, pero casi la mitad de estos nuevos casos presentaban un diagnóstico tardío (<350CD4cel/μl). Las guías actuales recomiendan ofrecer anualmente el cribado de ITS a las poblaciones de riesgo y más frecuentemente en función de dicho riesgo. Las ITS pueden presentarse, entre otras, en forma de síndromes, como son el síndrome secretor (uretritis, proctitis, cervicitis) o el síndrome ulcerado (úlceras). Las ITS que pueden cursar con síndrome secretor están causadas principalmente por Neisseria gonorrhoeae y C.trachomatis, que infectan conjuntamente hasta en el 40% de los casos, y que producen uretritis, cervicitis o proctitis según el lugar en que se localizan. El gonococo tiene un periodo de incubación de 2 a 7días y la clamidia de 2 a 6semanas, y se diagnostican a través de PCR y/o cultivo (este último solo válido para gonococo) de las muestras recogidas según prácticas sexuales...(AU)

These days sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are important public health problems not only due to their high prevalence, but also because they require early diagnosis and treatment to avoid complications.In recent years, there has been an exponential increase in cases of infections caused by Chlamydia trachomatis and gonococcus in the population under 25years of age. In addition, an increase in the incidence of syphilis and hepatitisC (HCV) has also been detected, especially in men who have sex with other men (MSM). Genital herpes continues to be the second most frequent STI in the world, behind condyloma acuminata, and the first cause of genital ulcer among Spain in the sexually active population. A decrease in reported HIV cases was observed during 2020, but almost half of these new cases had a late diagnosis (<350CD4cell/μL). Current guidelines recommend offering STI annual screening to populations at risk or more often depending on the risk. STIs can appear in the form of syndromes, such as secretory syndrome (urethritis, proctitis, and cervicitis) or ulcerated syndrome (ulcers). The STIs that can cause secretory syndrome are mainly caused by Neisseria gonorrhoeae and C.trachomatis, which co-infect up to 40% of cases, and also cause urethritis, cervicitis or proctitis depending on where they are located. Gonococcus has an incubation period of 2-7days and Chlamydia 2-6weeks, and they are diagnosed using PCR and/or culture (the last one only valid for gonococcus) of samples collected according to sexual activities...(AU)

[Primary care management of sexually transmitted infections (I). Epidemiology. Secreting syndrome]. / Manejo en atención primaria de las infecciones de transmisión sexual (I). Epidemiología. Síndrome secretor.

These days sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are important public health problems not only due to their high prevalence, but also because they require early diagnosis and treatment to avoid complications. In recent years, there has been an exponential increase in cases of infections caused by Chlamydia trachomatis and gonococcus in the population under 25years of age. In addition, an increase in the incidence of syphilis and hepatitisC (HCV) has also been detected, especially in men who have sex with other men (MSM). Genital herpes continues to be the second most frequent STI in the world, behind condyloma acuminata, and the first cause of genital ulcer among Spain in the sexually active population. A decrease in reported HIV cases was observed during 2020, but almost half of these new cases had a late diagnosis (<350CD4cell/µL). Current guidelines recommend offering STI annual screening to populations at risk or more often depending on the risk. STIs can appear in the form of syndromes, such as secretory syndrome (urethritis, proctitis, and cervicitis) or ulcerated syndrome (ulcers). The STIs that can cause secretory syndrome are mainly caused by Neisseria gonorrhoeae and C.trachomatis, which co-infect up to 40% of cases, and also cause urethritis, cervicitis or proctitis depending on where they are located. Gonococcus has an incubation period of 2-7days and Chlamydia 2-6weeks, and they are diagnosed using PCR and/or culture (the last one only valid for gonococcus) of samples collected according to sexual activities. Empirical treatment to cover both germs will be accomplished with ceftriaxone, 1g single intramuscular dose plus doxycycline 100mg every 12h orally for 7days, or azithromycin 1g single dose orally (we will use azithromycin only if we suspect a poor compliance with treatment, difficulty in going to the control or in pregnancy). Likewise, whenever we diagnose an STI firstly, we must offer advice and health education in order to promote the adoption of safe sexual behaviours and the correct use of barrier methods. Secondly, we must also screen for other STIs (HIV, syphilis, hepatitisB, and hepatitisA andC depending on the risk), offer HBV and HAV vaccination if it is appropriate, and finally study and treat all sexual partners from the previous 3months.

Vigilancia tras resección de pólipos de colon y de cáncer colorrectal. Actualización 2018 / Endoscopic surveillance after colonic polyps and colorrectal cancer resection. 2018 update

La evidencia disponible para estratificar el riesgo de presentar un cáncer colorrectal metacrónico tras la extirpación de pólipos colorrectales y determinar los intervalos de vigilancia es limitada y se basa en estudios observacionales. No obstante, a la espera de nuevas evidencias, es necesario unificar los criterios del seguimiento endoscópico en nuestro medio. Por ello, desde las principales sociedades científicas involucradas en el manejo de estos pacientes, como son la Asociación Española de Gastroenterología, la Sociedad Española de Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria, la Sociedad Española de Endoscopia Digestiva y el Grupo de Cribado de Cáncer Colorrectal de la Sociedad Española de Epidemiología, se ha creado este documento de consenso, que se encuentra incluido en el capítulo 10 de la «Guía de Práctica Clínica de Diagnóstico y Prevención del Cáncer Colorrectal. Actualización 2018». A continuación, se presentarán importantes novedades respecto a la edición previa publicada en 2009. En primer lugar, se establecen situaciones que requieren y no requieren vigilancia endoscópica y se elimina la necesidad de realizar seguimiento en individuos que no presentan un riesgo especial de cáncer de colon metacrono. En segundo lugar, se establecen recomendaciones de vigilancia endoscópica en individuos con pólipos serrados. Finalmente, a diferencia de la edición anterior, se dan recomendaciones de vigilancia endoscópica en individuos intervenidos por cáncer colorrectal. Paralelamente, supone un avance sobre la guía europea de calidad en el cribado del cáncer colorrectal, ya que elimina la división entre grupo de riesgo medio y grupo de riesgo alto, lo que supone la eliminación de una proporción considerable de colonoscopias de vigilancia precoz. Finalmente, se dan recomendaciones claras sobre la ausencia de necesidad de seguimiento en el grupo de riesgo bajo, para el que la guía europea mantenía cierta ambigüedad

There is limited scientific evidence available to stratify the risk of developing metachronous colorectal cancer after resection of colonic polyps and to determine surveillance intervals and is mostly based on observational studies. However, while awaiting further evidence, the criteria of endoscopic follow-up needs to be unified in our setting. Therefore, the Spanish Association of Gastroenterology, the Spanish Society of Family and Community Medicine, the Spanish Society of Digestive Endoscopy, and the Colorectal Cancer Screening Group of the Spanish Society of Epidemiology, have written this consensus document, which is included in chapter 10 of the "Clinical Practice Guideline for Diagnosis and Prevention of Colorectal Cancer. 2018 Update". Important developments will also be presented as regards the previous edition published in 2009. First of all, situations that require and do not require endoscopic surveillance are established, and the need of endoscopic surveillance of individuals who do not present a special risk of metachronous colon cancer is eliminated. Secondly, endoscopic surveillance recommendations are established in individuals with serrated polyps. Finally, unlike the previous edition, endoscopic surveillance recommendations are given in patients operated on for colorectal cancer. At the same time, it represents an advance on the European guideline for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening, since it eliminates the division between intermediate risk group and high risk group, which means the elimination of a considerable proportion of colonoscopies of early surveillance. Finally, clear recommendations are given on the absence of need for follow-up in the low risk group, for which the European guidelines maintained some ambiguity

Endoscopic surveillance after colonic polyps and colorrectal cancer resection. 2018 update. / Vigilancia tras resección de pólipos de colon y de cáncer colorrectal. Actualización 2018.

There is limited scientific evidence available to stratify the risk of developing metachronous colorectal cancer after resection of colonic polyps and to determine surveillance intervals and is mostly based on observational studies. However, while awaiting further evidence, the criteria of endoscopic follow-up needs to be unified in our setting. Therefore, the Spanish Association of Gastroenterology, the Spanish Society of Family and Community Medicine, the Spanish Society of Digestive Endoscopy, and the Colorectal Cancer Screening Group of the Spanish Society of Epidemiology, have written this consensus document, which is included in chapter 10 of the "Clinical Practice Guideline for Diagnosis and Prevention of Colorectal Cancer. 2018 Update". Important developments will also be presented as regards the previous edition published in 2009. First of all, situations that require and do not require endoscopic surveillance are established, and the need of endoscopic surveillance of individuals who do not present a special risk of metachronous colon cancer is eliminated. Secondly, endoscopic surveillance recommendations are established in individuals with serrated polyps. Finally, unlike the previous edition, endoscopic surveillance recommendations are given in patients operated on for colorectal cancer. At the same time, it represents an advance on the European guideline for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening, since it eliminates the division between intermediate risk group and high risk group, which means the elimination of a considerable proportion of colonoscopies of early surveillance. Finally, clear recommendations are given on the absence of need for follow-up in the low risk group, for which the European guidelines maintained some ambiguity.

Guía de práctica clínica. Diagnóstico y prevención del cáncer colorrectal. Actualización 2018 / Clinical practice guideline. Diagnosis and prevention of colorectal cancer. 2018 Update

Este documento actualiza las recomendaciones realizadas por la Sociedad Española de Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria y la Asociación Española de Gastroenterología para el diagnóstico y la prevención del cáncer colorrectal (CCR). Para establecer la calidad de la evidencia y los niveles de recomendación de las intervenciones se ha utilizado la metodología basada en el sistema GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation). Este documento establece intervalos de demora óptimos en función de los síntomas y el test de SOH inmunológico (SOHi) y recomienda reducir las barreras para la confirmación diagnóstica en los pacientes con síntomas. En cuanto al cribado en población de riesgo medio, se proponen estrategias para conseguir la implantación universal del cribado poblacional basado en SOHi bienal e incrementar la participación de la población diana, incluyendo la implicación de atención primaria. Esta guía de práctica clínica recomienda el cribado universal del síndrome de Lynch mediante la inmunohistoquímica de las proteínas reparadoras o la inestabilidad de microsatélites en los CCR incidentes y el uso de paneles de genes en los pacientes con poliposis adenomatosas. También actualiza las estrategias para reducir la incidencia y la mortalidad tanto de CCR como de otros tumores asociados a los síndromes hereditarios. En cuanto al CCR familiar no hereditario y la vigilancia tras resección de CCR, adenomas y lesiones serradas, se establecen recomendaciones en función del riesgo atribuible y la reducción del riesgo de la intervención propuesta. Finalmente, en el documento se incluyen recomendaciones respecto a los intervalos de vigilancia en la enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal y la actitud ante la displasia

This document updates the recommendations made by the Spanish Society of Family and Community Medicine and the Spanish Association of Gastroenterology for the diagnosis and prevention of colorectal cancer (CRC). In order to evaluate the quality of the evidence and determine the recommendation levels of the interventions, we used the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. This document establishes optimal delay intervals based on symptoms and the faecal immunochemical test (FIT) and recommends reducing the barriers for diagnostic confirmation in symptomatic subjects. With regard to CRC screening in the average-risk population, we propose strategies to achieve the universal implementation of organised CRC screening programmes based on biennial FIT and to increase the participation of the target population, including the involvement of Primary Healthcare. This Clinical Practice Guideline recommends universal screening for Lynch syndrome with mismatch repair proteins immunohistochemistry or microsatellite instability in incident CRCs and the use of gene panels in patients with adenomatous polyposis. It also updates the strategies to reduce the incidence and mortality of both CRC and other tumours associated with hereditary syndromes. Regarding non-hereditary familial CRC and surveillance after resection of adenomas, serrated lesions or CRC, we established the recommendations based on the attributable risk and the risk reduction of the proposed intervention. Finally, the document includes recommendations regarding surveillance intervals in inflammatory bowel disease and the attitude towards dysplasia

Clinical practice guideline. Diagnosis and prevention of colorectal cancer. 2018 Update. / Guía de práctica clínica. Diagnóstico y prevención del cáncer colorrectal. Actualización 2018.

This document updates the recommendations made by the Spanish Society of Family and Community Medicine and the Spanish Association of Gastroenterology for the diagnosis and prevention of colorectal cancer (CRC). In order to evaluate the quality of the evidence and determine the recommendation levels of the interventions, we used the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. This document establishes optimal delay intervals based on symptoms and the faecal immunochemical test (FIT) and recommends reducing the barriers for diagnostic confirmation in symptomatic subjects. With regard to CRC screening in the average-risk population, we propose strategies to achieve the universal implementation of organised CRC screening programmes based on biennial FIT and to increase the participation of the target population, including the involvement of Primary Healthcare. This Clinical Practice Guideline recommends universal screening for Lynch syndrome with mismatch repair proteins immunohistochemistry or microsatellite instability in incident CRCs and the use of gene panels in patients with adenomatous polyposis. It also updates the strategies to reduce the incidence and mortality of both CRC and other tumours associated with hereditary syndromes. Regarding non-hereditary familial CRC and surveillance after resection of adenomas, serrated lesions or CRC, we established the recommendations based on the attributable risk and the risk reduction of the proposed intervention. Finally, the document includes recommendations regarding surveillance intervals in inflammatory bowel disease and the attitude towards dysplasia.

Guía de práctica clínica. Diagnóstico y prevención del cáncer colorrectal. Actualización 2018 / Clinical practice guideline. Diagnosis and prevention of colorectal cancer. 2018 Update

[{"text": "Este documento actualiza las recomendaciones realizadas por la Sociedad Española de Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria y la Asociación Española de Gastroenterología para el diagnóstico y la prevención del cáncer colorrectal (CCR). Para establecer la calidad de la evidencia y los niveles de recomendación de las intervenciones se ha utilizado la metodología basada en el sistema GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation). Este documento establece intervalos de demora óptimos en función de los síntomas y el test de SOH inmunológico (SOHi) y recomienda reducir las barreras para la confirmación diagnóstica en los pacientes con síntomas. En cuanto al cribado en población de riesgo medio, se proponen estrategias para conseguir la implantación universal del cribado poblacional basado en SOHi bienal e incrementar la participación de la población diana, incluyendo la implicación de atención primaria. Esta guía de práctica clínica recomienda el cribado universal del síndrome de Lynch mediante la inmunohistoquímica de las proteínas reparadoras o la inestabilidad de microsatélites en los CCR incidentes y el uso de paneles de genes en los pacientes con poliposis adenomatosas. También actualiza las estrategias para reducir la incidencia y la mortalidad tanto de CCR como de otros tumores asociados a los síndromes hereditarios. En cuanto al CCR familiar no hereditario y la vigilancia tras resección de CCR, adenomas y lesiones serradas, se establecen recomendaciones en función del riesgo atribuible y la reducción del riesgo de la intervención propuesta. Finalmente, en el documento se incluyen recomendaciones respecto a los intervalos de vigilancia en la enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal y la actitud ante la displasia.", "_i": "es"}, {"text": "This document updates the recommendations made by the Spanish Society of Family and Community Medicine and the Spanish Association of Gastroenterology for the diagnosis and prevention of colorectal cancer (CRC). In order to evaluate the quality of the evidence and determine the recommendation levels of the interventions, we used the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. This document establishes optimal delay intervals based on symptoms and the faecal immunochemical test (FIT) and recommends reducing the barriers for diagnostic confirmation in symptomatic subjects. With regard to CRC screening in the average-risk population, we propose strategies to achieve the universal implementation of organised CRC screening programmes based on biennial FIT and to increase the participation of the target population, including the involvement of Primary Healthcare. This Clinical Practice Guideline recommends universal screening for Lynch syndrome with mismatch repair proteins immunohistochemistry or microsatellite instability in incident CRCs and the use of gene panels in patients with adenomatous polyposis. It also updates the strategies to reduce the incidence and mortality of both CRC and other tumours associated with hereditary syndromes. Regarding non-hereditary familial CRC and surveillance after resection of adenomas, serrated lesions or CRC, we established the recommendations based on the attributable risk and the risk reduction of the proposed intervention. Finally, the document includes recommendations regarding surveillance intervals in inflammatory bowel disease and the attitude towards dysplasia.", "_i": "en"}]

Factor impacto y revista Atención Primaria / Impact factor and Atención Primaria journal

No disponible

Management of the clinical issue of constipation with abdominal complaints in adults. A national survey of Primary Care physicians and gastroenterologists.

Irritable bowel syndrome and functional constipation represent a relevant and common health issue. However, real-world clinical practice includes patients with constipation who may or may not have other abdominal complaints (pain, bloating, abdominal discomfort) with variable frequency. The goal of the present study was to obtain information on the workload entailed by patients with constipation and associated abdominal complaints, predominant clinical behaviors, education needs, and potential daily practice aids both in Primary Care and gastroenterology settings. The clinical behavior of doctors is generally similar at both levels, despite differences in healthcare approach: use of empiric therapies and clinically guided diagnostic tests, with some differences in colonoscopy use (not always directly accessible from Primary Care). Regarding perceptions, general support and osmotic laxatives are most valued by PC doctors, whereas osmotic laxatives, combined laxatives, and linaclotide are most valued by GE specialists. Furthermore, over half of respondents considered differentiating both diagnoses as challenging. Finally, considerable education needs are self-acknowledged at both levels, as is a demand for guidelines and protocols to help in managing this issue in clinical practice. A strength of this study is its providing a joint photograph of the medical approach and the perceptions of constipation with abdominal discomfort from a medical standpoint. Weaknesses include self-declaration (no formal validation) and a response rate potentially biased by professional motivation.

Dos años de Open Access / No disponible

No disponible

Manejo del paciente con dispepsia. Guía de práctica clínica. Actualización 2012. Resumen ejecutivo / Managing of the patient with dyspepsia. Clinical Practice Guideline. Update 2012

El programa de «Elaboración de guías de práctica clínica en enfermedades digestivas, desde la atención primaria a la especializada» es un proyecto compartido por la Asociación Española de Gastroenterología (AEG), la Sociedad Española de Medicina de Familia y Comunitaria (semFYC) y el Centro Cochrane Iberoamericano (CCI). Presentamos la actualización de la guía sobre el manejo de la dispepsia que se publicó en el año 2003. En su elaboración se han tenido en cuenta los criterios esenciales contemplados en el instrumento Appraisal of Guidelines, Research and Evaluation for Europe (AGREE). Para clasificar la evidencia científica y fuerza de las recomendaciones se ha utilizado el sistema Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation Working Group (GRADE)(AU)

The "Preparation of Clinical Practice Guidelines in Digestive Diseases, from Primary Care to Specialist Care" Program, is a joint project by the Spanish Gastroenterology Association (AEG), the Spanish Society of Family and Community Medicine (SEMFyC), and the IberoAmerican Cochrane Center (CCI). We present the update of the Guidelines on the Management of Dyspepsia, which was published in 2003. The essential criteria provided in the AGREE (Appraisal of Guidelines, Research and Evaluation for Europe) Instrument were taken into account in the preparation of this document. The GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) system was used to classify the scientific evidence and strengthen the recommendations(AU)

[Managing of the patient with dyspepsia. Clinical Practice Guideline. Update 2012]. / Manejo del paciente con dispepsia. Guía de práctica clínica. Actualización 2012. Resumen ejecutivo.

The "Preparation of Clinical Practice Guidelines in Digestive Diseases, from Primary Care to Specialist Care" Program, is a joint project by the Spanish Gastroenterology Association (AEG), the Spanish Society of Family and Community Medicine (SEMFyC), and the IberoAmerican Cochrane Center (CCI). We present the update of the Guidelines on the Management of Dyspepsia, which was published in 2003. The essential criteria provided in the AGREE (Appraisal of Guidelines, Research and Evaluation for Europe) Instrument were taken into account in the preparation of this document. The GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) system was used to classify the scientific evidence and strengthen the recommendations.